The Importance of Fertility Rate

I suppose it should be kind of obvious, shouldn't it?

From a demographic standpoint, if a group has sub-replacement fertility, it's literally dying off. A group is either growing or dying, at potential variances around a "static" point that is never quite a real state of being.

As a whole though, and repeated daily, mainstream society has decided that there are too many people. As a whole, society has also shifted it's focal point away from family. Everything that is not reproductive is touted as a good: abortion, contraception, delayed marriage, same-sex "marriage (which, obviously, can't be reproductive).

The whole trend, for anyone who listens, is demographic suicide. Interestingly, the only people who do listen are those same people who are inundated by first-world mass media daily: mostly European and Asian-descended nations.

These same groups of people tend to have higher IQs, which is only controversial in the same sense that "it's okay to murder children in the womb" is controversial - it's only such because the mass media has decided it should be so.

That is, the only people committing demographic suicide are above average intelligence, above average education, and above average responsibility - they tend to plan for the future more (e.g. bothering to use contraception consistently). Now, there is work on "solutions" for those who are less-responsible - such as abortion. There is also work on long-term or somewhat permanent contraceptions (maybe it can be a sort of default medical procedure given around the time of puberty, like a vaccine) which would solve the discrepancy.

Yet, this is only a solution insofar that one accepts demographic suicide, as a whole, for everyone, is a good thing!

That is, more specifically, the solution to the discrepancy is for the more intelligent groups, effectively committing slow suicide, will also force the less intelligent groups to commit slow suicide. Because the less intelligent groups, much to the dismay of the more intelligent, wouldn't willingly commit suicide ("voluntarily limit fertility rates") - one can't really call it suicide can they? Maybe "soft genocide" or "long-term, painless genocide" would be more appropriate terms. It's sort of akin to the modern death penalty, where instead of public hangings, we've made it a private, painless process.

Religion, in general, appears to be an anti-dote to this "solution" (read: poison) and, as such, generally coopted or hated by the mainstream media and society it engenders. Christianity is an example of this, which has slowly accepted practices like abortion despite historical opposition. Even Catholics, which officially oppose contraception and abortion, is currently committing voluntary society.

There are some minority groups, like the Amish, who don't participate in the slow mass suicide and child sacrifice trend. That is because they fully isolate themselves from mainstream society, both socially and technologically.

Interestingly though, there is one group, that is highly intelligent, highly educated, wealthy, and fully integrated into modern society and technology. That group stands almost completely alone in being fully integrated into first-world society, yet completely opposing these overwhelmingly evil trends: that is, the Mormons.